Topics |
Author |
Views |
Replies |
Last Post |
Recently imprisoned
|
idriskhan2013
|
834 |
1 |
mabaker |
Record of outcome -Yeovil Magistrates
|
simondavidbond
|
1109 |
0 |
simondavidbond |
records
|
zarzar
|
898 |
0 |
zarzar |
Refusal of Access to Children
|
BelleBaby
|
664 |
0 |
BelleBaby |
regina -v- kearley 1992
Hello This is a case that was reviewed on appeal in 1992 and relates to the "hearsay" rule and admissibility of that rule. The case went to appeal in 1991 and I assume that case appeal was dismissed. The ruling from 1992 states that the appeal (on that occasion) was allowed. Reading the judgement I am a little coinfused as it appears that 3 judges ruled in favour of the appellant (defendant) with 2 against. I am trying to determine that in this particular case the hearsay admissibility rule can be applied to the circumstances as in this particular case. Was the appeal upheld or dismissed and what does "allowed" mean? Thanks |
georgesmith6
|
1478 |
1 |
dftlp |